Home  ›  Bold European Artworks Displayed at the Armory Show Helped Change the Style of Art in America

Bold European Artworks Displayed at the Armory Show Helped Change the Style of Art in America

Written By Tuesday 10 May 2022 Add Comment Edit

Early-20th-century avant-garde art movement

Not to be confused with QBism.

Cubism is an early-20th-century avant-garde fine art motion that revolutionized European painting and sculpture, and inspired related movements in music, literature and architecture. In Cubist artwork, objects are analyzed, broken up and reassembled in an abstracted form—instead of depicting objects from a single viewpoint, the artist depicts the subject from a multitude of viewpoints to represent the bailiwick in a greater context.[one] Cubism has been considered the most influential art move of the 20th century.[2] [3] The term is broadly used in association with a wide variety of fine art produced in Paris (Montmartre and Montparnasse) or most Paris (Puteaux) during the 1910s and throughout the 1920s.

The move was pioneered by Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque, and joined past Jean Metzinger, Albert Gleizes, Robert Delaunay, Henri Le Fauconnier, Juan Gris, and Fernand Léger.[4] I master influence that led to Cubism was the representation of three-dimensional form in the late works of Paul Cézanne.[five] A retrospective of Cézanne's paintings had been held at the Salon d'Automne of 1904, current works were displayed at the 1905 and 1906 Salon d'Automne, followed by 2 commemorative retrospectives after his decease in 1907.[six]

In France, offshoots of Cubism developed, including Orphism, abstruse fine art and later Purism.[seven] [8] The affect of Cubism was far-reaching and broad-ranging. In France and other countries Futurism, Suprematism, Dada, Constructivism, Vorticism, De Stijl and Art Deco adult in response to Cubism. Early on Futurist paintings hold in mutual with Cubism the fusing of the past and the nowadays, the representation of dissimilar views of the subject field pictured at the same time or successively, besides called multiple perspective, simultaneity or multiplicity,[9] while Constructivism was influenced by Picasso's technique of constructing sculpture from separate elements.[x] Other mutual threads between these disparate movements include the faceting or simplification of geometric forms, and the association of mechanization and modern life.

History [edit]

Historians accept divided the history of Cubism into phases. In one scheme, the first phase of Cubism, known as Analytic Cubism, a phrase coined past Juan Gris a posteriori,[eleven] was both radical and influential as a short but highly significant art move between 1910 and 1912 in France. A second phase, Synthetic Cubism, remained vital until around 1919, when the Surrealist movement gained popularity. English art historian Douglas Cooper proposed another scheme, describing three phases of Cubism in his book, The Cubist Epoch. According to Cooper there was "Early Cubism", (from 1906 to 1908) when the movement was initially adult in the studios of Picasso and Braque; the 2d phase being called "High Cubism", (from 1909 to 1914) during which time Juan Gris emerged as an important exponent (afterwards 1911); and finally Cooper referred to "Late Cubism" (from 1914 to 1921) equally the final stage of Cubism as a radical advanced motion.[12] Douglas Cooper's restrictive utilize of these terms to distinguish the work of Braque, Picasso, Gris (from 1911) and Léger (to a lesser extent) unsaid an intentional value judgement.[5]

Pablo Picasso, 1909–10, Effigy dans un Fauteuil (Seated Nude, Femme nue assise), oil on sheet, 92.1 × 73 cm, Tate Modernistic, London

Proto-Cubism: 1907–1908 [edit]

Cubism burgeoned between 1907 and 1911. Pablo Picasso'due south 1907 painting Les Demoiselles d'Avignon has often been considered a proto-Cubist work.

In 1908, in his review of Georges Braque's exhibition at Kahnweiler's gallery, the critic Louis Vauxcelles chosen Braque a daring human being who despises form, "reducing everything, places and a figures and houses, to geometric schemas, to cubes".[14] [xv]

Vauxcelles recounted how Matisse told him at the time, "Braque has merely sent in [to the 1908 Salon d'Automne] a painting made of little cubes".[15] The critic Charles Morice relayed Matisse's words and spoke of Braque's little cubes. The motif of the viaduct at l'Estaque had inspired Braque to produce three paintings marked past the simplification of form and deconstruction of perspective.[16]

Georges Braque's 1908 Houses at L'Estaque (and related works) prompted Vauxcelles, in Gil Blas, 25 March 1909, to refer to bizarreries cubiques (cubic oddities).[17] Gertrude Stein referred to landscapes made by Picasso in 1909, such as Reservoir at Horta de Ebro, as the first Cubist paintings. The starting time organized grouping exhibition by Cubists took place at the Salon des Indépendants in Paris during the spring of 1911 in a room chosen 'Salle 41'; it included works by Jean Metzinger, Albert Gleizes, Fernand Léger, Robert Delaunay and Henri Le Fauconnier, yet no works by Picasso or Braque were exhibited.[5]

By 1911 Picasso was recognized as the inventor of Cubism, while Braque'south importance and precedence was argued afterwards, with respect to his treatment of infinite, volume and mass in the L'Estaque landscapes. But "this view of Cubism is associated with a distinctly restrictive definition of which artists are properly to be chosen Cubists," wrote the art historian Christopher Green: "Marginalizing the contribution of the artists who exhibited at the Salon des Indépendants in 1911 [...]"[5]

The assertion that the Cubist delineation of space, mass, fourth dimension, and book supports (rather than contradicts) the flatness of the canvas was made past Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler every bit early equally 1920,[18] just it was discipline to criticism in the 1950s and 1960s, particularly by Clement Greenberg.[19]

Contemporary views of Cubism are complex, formed to some extent in response to the "Salle 41" Cubists, whose methods were too singled-out from those of Picasso and Braque to be considered merely secondary to them. Culling interpretations of Cubism have therefore developed. Wider views of Cubism include artists who were later associated with the "Salle 41" artists, e.g., Francis Picabia; the brothers Jacques Villon, Raymond Duchamp-Villon and Marcel Duchamp, who beginning in late 1911 formed the cadre of the Department d'Or (or the Puteaux Group); the sculptors Alexander Archipenko, Joseph Csaky and Ossip Zadkine as well as Jacques Lipchitz and Henri Laurens; and painters such every bit Louis Marcoussis, Roger de La Fresnaye, František Kupka, Diego Rivera, Léopold Survage, Auguste Herbin, André Lhote, Gino Severini (after 1916), María Blanchard (afterward 1916) and Georges Valmier (after 1918). More fundamentally, Christopher Light-green argues that Douglas Cooper's terms were "later on undermined by interpretations of the piece of work of Picasso, Braque, Gris and Léger that stress iconographic and ideological questions rather than methods of representation."[5]

John Berger identifies the essence of Cubism with the mechanical diagram. "The metaphorical model of Cubism is the diagram: The diagram being a visible symbolic representation of invisible processes, forces, structures. A diagram need not eschew sure aspects of appearance only these too volition exist treated as signs not equally imitations or recreations."[twenty]

Early Cubism: 1909–1914 [edit]

Albert Gleizes, L'Homme au Balcon, Man on a Balcony (Portrait of Dr. Théo Morinaud), 1912, oil on canvass, 195.6 × 114.ix cm (77 × 45 i/4 in.), Philadelphia Museum of Art. Completed the same year that Albert Gleizes co-authored the book Du "Cubisme" with Jean Metzinger. Exhibited at Salon d'Automne, Paris, 1912, Armory testify, New York, Chicago, Boston, 1913

There was a distinct divergence between Kahnweiler'southward Cubists and the Salon Cubists. Prior to 1914, Picasso, Braque, Gris and Léger (to a lesser extent) gained the support of a single committed art dealer in Paris, Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler, who guaranteed them an annual income for the exclusive right to buy their works. Kahnweiler sold simply to a small circle of connoisseurs. His back up gave his artists the freedom to experiment in relative privacy. Picasso worked in Montmartre until 1912, while Braque and Gris remained there until later the First World State of war. Léger was based in Montparnasse.[5]

In contrast, the Salon Cubists built their reputation primarily by exhibiting regularly at the Salon d'Automne and the Salon des Indépendants, both major non-bookish Salons in Paris. They were inevitably more enlightened of public response and the need to communicate.[5] Already in 1910 a group began to form which included Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay and Léger. They met regularly at Henri le Fauconnier's studio near the boulevard du Montparnasse. These soirées often included writers such as Guillaume Apollinaire and André Salmon. Together with other young artists, the group wanted to emphasise a research into form, in opposition to the Neo-Impressionist emphasis on colour.[21]

Louis Vauxcelles, in his review of the 26th Salon des Indépendants (1910), fabricated a passing and imprecise reference to Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay, Léger and Le Fauconnier as "ignorant geometers, reducing the homo body, the site, to pallid cubes."[22] [23] At the 1910 Salon d'Automne, a few months later, Metzinger exhibited his highly fractured Nu à la cheminée (Nude), which was subsequently reproduced in both Du "Cubisme" (1912) and Les Peintres Cubistes (1913).[24]

The first public controversy generated by Cubism resulted from Salon showings at the Indépendants during the spring of 1911. This showing past Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay, le Fauconnier and Léger brought Cubism to the attending of the general public for the starting time fourth dimension. Amongst the Cubist works presented, Robert Delaunay exhibited his Eiffel Tower, Tour Eiffel (Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York).[25]

The "Cubists" Boss Paris' Fall Salon, The New York Times, October 8, 1911. Picasso's 1908 Seated Adult female (Meditation) is reproduced along with a photo of the artist in his studio (upper left). Metzinger'due south Baigneuses (1908–09) is reproduced top right. Also reproduced are works by Derain, Matisse, Friesz, Herbin, and a photograph of Braque

At the Salon d'Automne of the same yr, in addition to the Indépendants group of Salle 41, were exhibited works by André Lhote, Marcel Duchamp, Jacques Villon, Roger de La Fresnaye, André Dunoyer de Segonzac and František Kupka. The exhibition was reviewed in the Oct eight, 1911 effect of The New York Times. This article was published a year afterwards Gelett Burgess' The Wild Men of Paris,[26] and 2 years prior to the Armory Testify, which introduced astonished Americans, accustomed to realistic fine art, to the experimental styles of the European avant garde, including Fauvism, Cubism, and Futurism. The 1911 New York Times commodity portrayed works by Picasso, Matisse, Derain, Metzinger and others dated before 1909; not exhibited at the 1911 Salon. The article was titled The "Cubists" Dominate Paris' Fall Salon and subtitled Eccentric School of Painting Increases Its Vogue in the Electric current Art Exhibition – What Its Followers Endeavour to Do. [27] [28]

Among all the paintings on exhibition at the Paris Fall Salon none is attracting so much attending equally the extraordinary productions of the so-chosen "Cubist" school. In fact, dispatches from Paris propose that these works are hands the main feature of the exhibition. [...]

In spite of the crazy nature of the "Cubist" theories the number of those professing them is adequately respectable. Georges Braque, André Derain, Picasso, Czobel, Othon Friesz, Herbin, Metzinger—these are a few of the names signed to canvases before which Paris has stood and now again stands in blank amazement.

What exercise they hateful? Have those responsible for them taken exit of their senses? Is it art or madness? Who knows?[27] [28]

Salon des Indépendants [edit]

The subsequent 1912 Salon des Indépendants located in Paris (20 March to 16 May 1912) was marked by the presentation of Marcel Duchamp's Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2, which itself caused a scandal, even amongst the Cubists. It was in fact rejected by the hanging committee, which included his brothers and other Cubists. Although the work was shown in the Salon de la Section d'Or in October 1912 and the 1913 Armory Show in New York, Duchamp never forgave his brothers and erstwhile colleagues for censoring his work.[21] [29] Juan Gris, a new add-on to the Salon scene, exhibited his Portrait of Picasso (Fine art Institute of Chicago), while Metzinger's two showings included La Femme au Cheval (Woman with a equus caballus) 1911–1912 (National Gallery of Kingdom of denmark).[30] Delaunay's monumental La Ville de Paris (Musée d'fine art moderne de la Ville de Paris) and Léger's La Noce, The Nuptials (Musée National d'Art Moderne, Paris), were also exhibited.

Galeries Dalmau [edit]

In 1912, Galeries Dalmau presented the first declared group exhibition of Cubism worldwide (Exposició d'Art Cubista),[31] [32] [33] with a controversial showing by Jean Metzinger, Albert Gleizes, Juan Gris, Marie Laurencin and Marcel Duchamp (Barcelona, twenty Apr to 10 May 1912). The Dalmau exhibition comprised 83 works by 26 artists.[34] [35] [36] Jacques Nayral's association with Gleizes led him to write the Preface for the Cubist exhibition,[31] which was fully translated and reproduced in the newspaper La Veu de Catalunya.[37] [38] Duchamp'due south Nude Descending a Staircase, No. ii was exhibited for the commencement time.[39]

Extensive media coverage (in newspapers and magazines) before, during and after the exhibition launched the Galeries Dalmau as a force in the development and propagation of modernism in Europe.[39] While press coverage was extensive, it was not always positive. Articles were published in the newspapers Esquella de La Torratxa [40] and El Noticiero Universal [41] attacking the Cubists with a series of caricatures laced with derogatory text.[41] Fine art historian Jaime Brihuega writes of the Dalmau show: "No dubiety that the exhibition produced a strong commotion in the public, who welcomed it with a lot of suspicion.[42]

Salon d'Automne [edit]

The Cubist contribution to the 1912 Salon d'Automne created scandal regarding the employ of government owned buildings, such as the Grand Palais, to exhibit such artwork. The indignation of the politician Jean Pierre Philippe Lampué made the front page of Le Journal, 5 October 1912.[43] The controversy spread to the Municipal Quango of Paris, leading to a debate in the Chambre des Députés about the use of public funds to provide the venue for such fine art.[44] The Cubists were defended by the Socialist deputy, Marcel Sembat.[44] [45] [46]

It was against this groundwork of public acrimony that Jean Metzinger and Albert Gleizes wrote Du "Cubisme" (published by Eugène Figuière in 1912, translated to English and Russian in 1913).[47] Among the works exhibited were Le Fauconnier's vast composition Les Montagnards attaqués par des ours (Mountaineers Attacked past Bears) at present at Rhode Island School of Pattern Museum, Joseph Csaky'south Deux Femme, Two Women (a sculpture at present lost), in add-on to the highly abstract paintings by Kupka, Amorpha (The National Gallery, Prague), and Picabia, La Source (The Jump) (Museum of Mod Fine art, New York).

Abstraction and the ready-made [edit]

The about extreme forms of Cubism were non those practiced by Picasso and Braque, who resisted total brainchild. Other Cubists, by dissimilarity, peculiarly František Kupka, and those considered Orphists by Apollinaire (Delaunay, Léger, Picabia and Duchamp), accepted abstraction past removing visible subject affair entirely. Kupka'southward 2 entries at the 1912 Salon d'Automne, Amorpha-Fugue à deux couleurs and Amorpha chromatique chaude, were highly abstruse (or nonrepresentational) and metaphysical in orientation. Both Duchamp in 1912 and Picabia from 1912 to 1914 developed an expressive and allusive abstraction defended to complex emotional and sexual themes. Starting time in 1912 Delaunay painted a series of paintings entitled Simultaneous Windows, followed past a series entitled Formes Circulaires, in which he combined planar structures with brilliant prismatic hues; based on the optical characteristics of juxtaposed colors his divergence from reality in the depiction of imagery was quasi-consummate. In 1913–fourteen Léger produced a series entitled Contrasts of Forms, giving a similar stress to color, line and form. His Cubism, despite its abstruse qualities, was associated with themes of mechanization and modern life. Apollinaire supported these early developments of abstract Cubism in Les Peintres cubistes (1913),[24] writing of a new "pure" painting in which the subject was vacated. But in spite of his use of the term Orphism these works were so different that they defy attempts to identify them in a single category.[five]

Besides labeled an Orphist by Apollinaire, Marcel Duchamp was responsible for another extreme development inspired by Cubism. The fix-made arose from a articulation consideration that the work itself is considered an object (just as a painting), and that it uses the material detritus of the world (as collage and papier collé in the Cubist construction and Assemblage). The next logical footstep, for Duchamp, was to present an ordinary object equally a self-sufficient work of art representing merely itself. In 1913 he fastened a bicycle wheel to a kitchen stool and in 1914 selected a canteen-drying rack as a sculpture in its own right.[5]

Section d'Or [edit]

The Department d'Or, also known as Groupe de Puteaux, founded past some of the most conspicuous Cubists, was a collective of painters, sculptors and critics associated with Cubism and Orphism, active from 1911 through about 1914, coming to prominence in the wake of their controversial showing at the 1911 Salon des Indépendants. The Salon de la Section d'Or at the Galerie La Boétie in Paris, Oct 1912, was arguably the most important pre-World State of war I Cubist exhibition; exposing Cubism to a wide audience. Over 200 works were displayed, and the fact that many of the artists showed artworks representative of their evolution from 1909 to 1912 gave the exhibition the attraction of a Cubist retrospective.[48]

The group seems to accept adopted the name Section d'Or to distinguish themselves from the narrower definition of Cubism adult in parallel past Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque in the Montmartre quarter of Paris, and to bear witness that Cubism, rather than existence an isolated art-form, represented the continuation of a grand tradition (indeed, the golden ratio had fascinated Western intellectuals of various interests for at least 2,400 years).[49]

The idea of the Section d'Or originated in the course of conversations betwixt Metzinger, Gleizes and Jacques Villon. The grouping'south title was suggested by Villon, after reading a 1910 translation of Leonardo da Vinci's Trattato della Pittura by Joséphin Péladan.

During the belatedly 19th and early 20th centuries, Europeans were discovering African, Polynesian, Micronesian and Native American art. Artists such as Paul Gauguin, Henri Matisse, and Pablo Picasso were intrigued and inspired by the stark ability and simplicity of styles of those foreign cultures. Effectually 1906, Picasso met Matisse through Gertrude Stein, at a time when both artists had recently caused an interest in primitivism, Iberian sculpture, African art and African tribal masks. They became friendly rivals and competed with each other throughout their careers, mayhap leading to Picasso entering a new period in his work by 1907, marked by the influence of Greek, Iberian and African fine art. Picasso's paintings of 1907 accept been characterized equally Protocubism, as notably seen in Les Demoiselles d'Avignon, the antecedent of Cubism.[13]

The fine art historian Douglas Cooper states that Paul Gauguin and Paul Cézanne "were particularly influential to the formation of Cubism and especially important to the paintings of Picasso during 1906 and 1907".[50] Cooper goes on to say: "The Demoiselles is more often than not referred to equally the first Cubist picture. This is an exaggeration, for although it was a major first step towards Cubism it is not yet Cubist. The disruptive, expressionist element in information technology is even contrary to the spirit of Cubism, which looked at the world in a discrete, realistic spirit. Yet, the Demoiselles is the logical picture to take equally the starting betoken for Cubism, because information technology marks the birth of a new pictorial idiom, because in it Picasso violently overturned established conventions and because all that followed grew out of it."[13]

The near serious objection to regarding the Demoiselles as the origin of Cubism, with its evident influence of primitive art, is that "such deductions are unhistorical", wrote the fine art historian Daniel Robbins. This familiar caption "fails to give adequate consideration to the complexities of a flourishing art that existed simply earlier and during the period when Picasso'south new painting adult."[51] Between 1905 and 1908, a witting search for a new style caused rapid changes in art across France, Federal republic of germany, The Netherlands, Italia, and Russian federation. The Impressionists had used a double bespeak of view, and both Les Nabis and the Symbolists (who likewise admired Cézanne) flattened the picture plane, reducing their subjects to simple geometric forms. Neo-Impressionist structure and subject area thing, nigh notably to be seen in the works of Georges Seurat (eastward.thousand., Parade de Cirque, Le Chahut and Le Cirque), was some other important influence. There were also parallels in the development of literature and social thought.[51]

In addition to Seurat, the roots of cubism are to be plant in the two distinct tendencies of Cézanne's later work: first his breaking of the painted surface into small multifaceted areas of paint, thereby emphasizing the plural viewpoint given by binocular vision, and 2nd his interest in the simplification of natural forms into cylinders, spheres, and cones. However, the cubists explored this concept further than Cézanne. They represented all the surfaces of depicted objects in a single picture plane, equally if the objects had all their faces visible at the same time. This new kind of depiction revolutionized the way objects could be visualized in painting and art.

The historical study of Cubism began in the tardily 1920s, drawing at first from sources of limited data, namely the opinions of Guillaume Apollinaire. It came to rely heavily on Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler'south book Der Weg zum Kubismus (published in 1920), which centered on the developments of Picasso, Braque, Léger, and Gris. The terms "analytical" and "synthetic" which subsequently emerged have been widely accepted since the mid-1930s. Both terms are historical impositions that occurred later the facts they identify. Neither stage was designated as such at the time corresponding works were created. "If Kahnweiler considers Cubism as Picasso and Braque," wrote Daniel Robbins, "our only fault is in subjecting other Cubists' works to the rigors of that express definition."[51]

The traditional interpretation of "Cubism", formulated mail service facto every bit a means of understanding the works of Braque and Picasso, has affected our appreciation of other twentieth-century artists. It is difficult to apply to painters such as Jean Metzinger, Albert Gleizes, Robert Delaunay and Henri Le Fauconnier, whose cardinal differences from traditional Cubism compelled Kahnweiler to question whether to call them Cubists at all. Co-ordinate to Daniel Robbins, "To suggest that but because these artists developed differently or varied from the traditional pattern they deserved to be relegated to a secondary or satellite role in Cubism is a profound mistake."[51]

The history of the term "Cubism" normally stresses the fact that Matisse referred to "cubes" in connection with a painting by Braque in 1908, and that the term was published twice by the critic Louis Vauxcelles in a like context. Notwithstanding, the word "cube" was used in 1906 by another critic, Louis Chassevent, with reference not to Picasso or Braque merely rather to Metzinger and Delaunay:

"M. Metzinger is a mosaicist like One thousand. Signac but he brings more precision to the cutting of his cubes of color which appear to have been made mechanically [...]".[51] [52] [53]

The critical use of the word "cube" goes back at least to May 1901 when Jean Béral, reviewing the work of Henri-Edmond Cross at the Indépendants in Art et Littérature, commented that he "uses a large and square pointillism, giving the impression of mosaic. 1 fifty-fifty wonders why the creative person has non used cubes of solid thing diversely colored: they would make pretty revetments." (Robert Herbert, 1968, p. 221)[53]

The term Cubism did not come up into general usage until 1911, mainly with reference to Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay, and Léger.[51] In 1911, the poet and critic Guillaume Apollinaire accepted the term on behalf of a group of artists invited to exhibit at the Brussels Indépendants. The following year, in preparation for the Salon de la Section d'Or, Metzinger and Gleizes wrote and published Du "Cubisme" [54] in an endeavor to dispel the defoliation raging effectually the word, and equally a major defence of Cubism (which had caused a public scandal following the 1911 Salon des Indépendants and the 1912 Salon d'Automne in Paris).[55] Clarifying their aims equally artists, this piece of work was the get-go theoretical treatise on Cubism and information technology however remains the clearest and most intelligible. The effect, not solely a collaboration between its two authors, reflected discussions by the circumvolve of artists who met in Puteaux and Courbevoie. It mirrored the attitudes of the "artists of Passy", which included Picabia and the Duchamp brothers, to whom sections of it were read prior to publication.[5] [51] The concept developed in Du "Cubisme" of observing a subject from dissimilar points in infinite and fourth dimension simultaneously, i.e., the deed of moving around an object to seize information technology from several successive angles fused into a single paradigm (multiple viewpoints, mobile perspective, simultaneity or multiplicity), is a more often than not recognized device used by the Cubists.[56]

The 1912 manifesto Du "Cubisme" by Metzinger and Gleizes was followed in 1913 by Les Peintres Cubistes, a collection of reflections and commentaries by Guillaume Apollinaire.[24] Apollinaire had been closely involved with Picasso beginning in 1905, and Braque beginning in 1907, simply gave as much attention to artists such as Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay, Picabia, and Duchamp.[five]

The fact that the 1912 exhibition had been curated to show the successive stages through which Cubism had transited, and that Du "Cubisme" had been published for the occasion, indicates the artists' intention of making their piece of work comprehensible to a broad audience (art critics, fine art collectors, art dealers and the general public). Undoubtedly, due to the great success of the exhibition, Cubism became avant-garde motion recognized as a genre or style in art with a specific mutual philosophy or goal.[48]

Crystal Cubism: 1914–1918 [edit]

A significant modification of Cubism between 1914 and 1916 was signaled by a shift towards a strong emphasis on large overlapping geometric planes and flat surface activity. This group of styles of painting and sculpture, especially significant between 1917 and 1920, was expert by several artists; specially those nether contract with the fine art dealer and collector Léonce Rosenberg. The tightening of the compositions, the clarity and sense of club reflected in these works, led to its being referred to by the critic Maurice Raynal as 'crystal' Cubism. Considerations manifested by Cubists prior to the outset of World War I—such as the fourth dimension, dynamism of modernistic life, the occult, and Henri Bergson'due south concept of elapsing—had now been vacated, replaced past a purely formal frame of reference.[57]

Crystal Cubism, and its associative rappel à fifty'ordre, has been linked with an inclination—by those who served the armed forces and past those who remained in the civilian sector—to escape the realities of the Great War, both during and directly following the conflict. The purifying of Cubism from 1914 through the mid-1920s, with its cohesive unity and voluntary constraints, has been linked to a much broader ideological transformation towards conservatism in both French society and French culture.[5]

Cubism later 1918 [edit]

The most innovative menstruation of Cubism was before 1914[ commendation needed ]. After World War I, with the support given past the dealer Léonce Rosenberg, Cubism returned as a central issue for artists, and continued as such until the mid-1920s when its avant-garde status was rendered questionable by the emergence of geometric abstraction and Surrealism in Paris. Many Cubists, including Picasso, Braque, Gris, Léger, Gleizes, and Metzinger, while developing other styles, returned periodically to Cubism, even well after 1925. Cubism reemerged during the 1920s and the 1930s in the work of the American Stuart Davis and the Englishman Ben Nicholson. In France, however, Cubism experienced a decline beginning in nigh 1925. Léonce Rosenberg exhibited not only the artists stranded past Kahnweiler'southward exile but others including Laurens, Lipchitz, Metzinger, Gleizes, Csaky, Herbin and Severini. In 1918 Rosenberg presented a series of Cubist exhibitions at his Galerie de l'Effort Moderne in Paris. Attempts were fabricated by Louis Vauxcelles to argue that Cubism was expressionless, simply these exhibitions, along with a well-organized Cubist show at the 1920 Salon des Indépendants and a revival of the Salon de la Section d'Or in the same yr, demonstrated it was still alive.[5]

The reemergence of Cubism coincided with the advent from about 1917–24 of a coherent body of theoretical writing by Pierre Reverdy, Maurice Raynal and Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler and, among the artists, by Gris, Léger and Gleizes. The occasional return to classicism—figurative piece of work either exclusively or alongside Cubist work—experienced by many artists during this catamenia (called Neoclassicism) has been linked to the tendency to evade the realities of the war and also to the cultural dominance of a classical or Latin image of France during and immediately post-obit the war. Cubism after 1918 tin can be seen as part of a broad ideological shift towards conservatism in both French lodge and civilisation. Still, Cubism itself remained evolutionary both within the oeuvre of private artists, such equally Gris and Metzinger, and across the work of artists equally different from each other as Braque, Léger and Gleizes. Cubism every bit a publicly debated motion became relatively unified and open to definition. Its theoretical purity made information technology a judge against which such diverse tendencies equally Realism or Naturalism, Dada, Surrealism and abstraction could be compared.[v]

Diego Rivera, Portrait de Messieurs Kawashima et Foujita, 1914

Influence in Asia [edit]

Japan and China were among the first countries in Asia to be influenced past Cubism. Contact outset occurred via European texts translated and published in Japanese fine art journals in the 1910s. In the 1920s, Japanese and Chinese artists who studied in Paris, for case those enrolled at the École nationale supérieure des Beaux-Arts, brought dorsum with them both an understanding of modernistic art movements, including Cubism. Notable works exhibiting Cubist qualities were Tetsugorō Yorozu's Self Portrait with Red Eyes (1912) and Fang Ganmin's Melody in Fall (1934).[59] [60]

Estimation [edit]

Intentions and criticism [edit]

The Cubism of Picasso and Braque had more than than a technical or formal significance, and the distinct attitudes and intentions of the Salon Cubists produced different kinds of Cubism, rather than a derivative of their piece of work. "It is by no means clear, in any case," wrote Christopher Light-green, "to what extent these other Cubists depended on Picasso and Braque for their development of such techniques as faceting, 'passage' and multiple perspective; they could well accept arrived at such practices with little cognition of 'true' Cubism in its early stages, guided above all by their ain understanding of Cézanne." The works exhibited by these Cubists at the 1911 and 1912 Salons extended across the conventional Cézanne-like subjects—the posed model, even so-life and landscape—favored by Picasso and Braque to include large-scale modernistic-life subjects. Aimed at a large public, these works stressed the use of multiple perspective and complex planar faceting for expressive result while preserving the eloquence of subjects endowed with literary and philosophical connotations.[five]

In Du "Cubisme" Metzinger and Gleizes explicitly related the sense of time to multiple perspective, giving symbolic expression to the notion of 'duration' proposed by the philosopher Henri Bergson according to which life is subjectively experienced as a continuum, with the by flowing into the present and the present merging into the time to come. The Salon Cubists used the faceted treatment of solid and space and effects of multiple viewpoints to convey a physical and psychological sense of the fluidity of consciousness, blurring the distinctions between by, present and hereafter. 1 of the major theoretical innovations made by the Salon Cubists, independently of Picasso and Braque, was that of simultaneity,[5] drawing to greater or lesser extent on theories of Henri Poincaré, Ernst Mach, Charles Henry, Maurice Princet, and Henri Bergson. With simultaneity, the concept of separate spatial and temporal dimensions was comprehensively challenged. Linear perspective developed during the Renaissance was vacated. The subject matter was no longer considered from a specific indicate of view at a moment in fourth dimension, just built following a choice of successive viewpoints, i.e., as if viewed simultaneously from numerous angles (and in multiple dimensions) with the eye gratuitous to roam from 1 to the other.[56]

This technique of representing simultaneity, multiple viewpoints (or relative motion) is pushed to a high caste of complexity in Metzinger'due south Nu à la cheminée, exhibited at the 1910 Salon d'Automne; Gleizes' monumental Le Dépiquage des Moissons (Harvest Threshing), exhibited at the 1912 Salon de la Section d'Or; Le Fauconnier's Abundance shown at the Indépendants of 1911; and Delaunay'due south Urban center of Paris, exhibited at the Indépendants in 1912. These ambitious works are some of the largest paintings in the history of Cubism. Léger's The Wedding, also shown at the Salon des Indépendants in 1912, gave grade to the notion of simultaneity by presenting different motifs as occurring within a single temporal frame, where responses to the past and present interpenetrate with collective forcefulness. The conjunction of such subject matter with simultaneity aligns Salon Cubism with early on Futurist paintings by Umberto Boccioni, Gino Severini and Carlo Carrà; themselves made in response to early on Cubism.[9]

Cubism and modern European art was introduced into the U.s.a. at the at present legendary 1913 Arsenal Testify in New York Urban center, which and so traveled to Chicago and Boston. In the Armory testify Pablo Picasso exhibited La Femme au pot de moutarde (1910), the sculpture Head of a Adult female (Fernande) (1909–10), Les Arbres (1907) amidst other cubist works. Jacques Villon exhibited 7 of import and large drypoints, while his brother Marcel Duchamp shocked the American public with his painting Nude Descending a Staircase, No. two (1912). Francis Picabia exhibited his abstractions La Danse à la source and La Procession, Seville (both of 1912). Albert Gleizes exhibited La Femme aux phlox (1910) and Fifty'Homme au balcon (1912), two highly stylized and faceted cubist works. Georges Braque, Fernand Léger, Raymond Duchamp-Villon, Roger de La Fresnaye and Alexander Archipenko too contributed examples of their cubist works.

Cubist sculpture [edit]

Frontal view of the aforementioned statuary cast, 40.5 × 23 × 26 cm

These photos were published in Umělecký Mĕsíčník, 1913[62]

Just as in painting, Cubist sculpture is rooted in Paul Cézanne's reduction of painted objects into component planes and geometric solids (cubes, spheres, cylinders, and cones). And merely as in painting, it became a pervasive influence and contributed fundamentally to Constructivism and Futurism.

Cubist sculpture adult in parallel to Cubist painting. During the fall of 1909 Picasso sculpted Head of a Woman (Fernande) with positive features depicted by negative space and vice versa. According to Douglas Cooper: "The first truthful Cubist sculpture was Picasso's impressive Adult female'southward Head, modeled in 1909–10, a counterpart in iii dimensions to many similar analytical and faceted heads in his paintings at the time."[12] These positive/negative reversals were ambitiously exploited by Alexander Archipenko in 1912–13, for example in Adult female Walking.[v] Joseph Csaky, afterwards Archipenko, was the first sculptor in Paris to join the Cubists, with whom he exhibited from 1911 onwards. They were followed by Raymond Duchamp-Villon then in 1914 by Jacques Lipchitz, Henri Laurens and Ossip Zadkine.[63] [64]

Indeed, Cubist construction was as influential as any pictorial Cubist innovation. It was the stimulus behind the proto-Constructivist work of both Naum Gabo and Vladimir Tatlin and thus the starting-point for the entire constructive tendency in 20th-century modernist sculpture.[5]

Architecture [edit]

Le Corbusier, Assembly building, Chandigarh, India

Cubism formed an of import link betwixt early on-20th-century art and architecture.[65] The historical, theoretical, and socio-political relationships between avant-garde practices in painting, sculpture and architecture had early ramifications in France, Germany, the Netherlands and Czechoslovakia. Though there are many points of intersection between Cubism and architecture, only a few direct links between them can be drawn. Almost often the connections are made by reference to shared formal characteristics: faceting of course, spatial ambiguity, transparency, and multiplicity.[65]

Architectural interest in Cubism centered on the dissolution and reconstitution of three-dimensional course, using simple geometric shapes, juxtaposed without the illusions of classical perspective. Diverse elements could be superimposed, made transparent or penetrate one another, while retaining their spatial relationships. Cubism had get an influential factor in the development of modernistic architecture from 1912 (La Maison Cubiste, by Raymond Duchamp-Villon and André Mare) onwards, developing in parallel with architects such as Peter Behrens and Walter Gropius, with the simplification of building design, the utilize of materials appropriate to industrial production, and the increased use of glass.[66]

Cubism was relevant to an architecture seeking a mode that needed not refer to the past. Thus, what had go a revolution in both painting and sculpture was applied as part of "a profound reorientation towards a inverse earth".[66] [67] The Cubo-Futurist ideas of Filippo Tommaso Marinetti influenced attitudes in advanced architecture. The influential De Stijl movement embraced the aesthetic principles of Neo-plasticism developed past Piet Mondrian under the influence of Cubism in Paris. De Stijl was also linked by Gino Severini to Cubist theory through the writings of Albert Gleizes. Nonetheless, the linking of basic geometric forms with inherent beauty and ease of industrial application—which had been prefigured by Marcel Duchamp from 1914—was left to the founders of Purism, Amédée Ozenfant and Charles-Édouard Jeanneret (better known as Le Corbusier,) who exhibited paintings together in Paris and published Après le cubisme in 1918.[66] Le Corbusier's ambition had been to translate the backdrop of his ain style of Cubism to architecture. Between 1918 and 1922, Le Corbusier concentrated his efforts on Purist theory and painting. In 1922, Le Corbusier and his cousin Jeanneret opened a studio in Paris at 35 rue de Sèvres. His theoretical studies soon advanced into many different architectural projects.[68]

La Maison Cubiste (Cubist House) [edit]

Raymond Duchamp-Villon, 1912, Study for La Maison Cubiste, Projet d'Hotel (Cubist Firm). Image published in Les Peintres Cubistes, past Guillaume Apollinaire, 17 March 1913

Le Salon Conservative, designed by André Mare for La Maison Cubiste, in the decorative arts department of the Salon d'Automne, 1912, Paris. Metzinger's Femme à l'Éventail on the left wall

At the 1912 Salon d'Automne an architectural installation was exhibited that quickly became known equally Maison Cubiste (Cubist House), with architecture by Raymond Duchamp-Villon and interior decoration by André Mare along with a group of collaborators. Metzinger and Gleizes in Du "Cubisme", written during the assemblage of the "Maison Cubiste", wrote almost the autonomous nature of fine art, stressing the betoken that decorative considerations should not govern the spirit of art. Decorative work, to them, was the "antithesis of the movie". "The true film" wrote Metzinger and Gleizes, "bears its raison d'être within itself. Information technology can be moved from a church to a drawing-room, from a museum to a study. Essentially independent, necessarily complete, it demand non immediately satisfy the mind: on the contrary, it should lead it, picayune past little, towards the fictitious depths in which the coordinative light resides. Information technology does not harmonize with this or that ensemble; it harmonizes with things in full general, with the universe: it is an organism...".[69]

La Maison Cubiste was a fully furnished model business firm, with a facade, a staircase, wrought iron banisters, and two rooms: a living room—the Salon Bourgeois, where paintings past Marcel Duchamp, Metzinger (Woman with a Fan), Gleizes, Laurencin and Léger were hung, and a sleeping room. It was an example of Fifty'art décoratif, a dwelling within which Cubist art could be displayed in the condolement and manner of mod, bourgeois life. Spectators at the Salon d'Automne passed through the plaster facade, designed by Duchamp-Villon, to the two furnished rooms.[70] This architectural installation was later exhibited at the 1913 Arsenal Show, New York, Chicago and Boston,[71] listed in the catalogue of the New York exhibit every bit Raymond Duchamp-Villon, number 609, and entitled "Facade architectural, plaster" (Façade architecturale).[72] [73]

Jacques Doucet's hôtel particulier, 33 rue Saint-James, Neuilly-sur-Seine

The furnishings, wallpaper, upholstery and carpets of the interior were designed by André Mare, and were early examples of the influence of cubism on what would get Art Deco. They were composed of very brightly colored roses and other floral patterns in stylized geometric forms.

Mare called the living room in which Cubist paintings were hung the Salon Bourgeois. Léger described this name as 'perfect'. In a letter to Mare prior to the exhibition Léger wrote: "Your idea is absolutely excellent for the states, really splendid. People will see Cubism in its domestic setting, which is very important.[2]

"Mare's ensembles were accustomed as frames for Cubist works because they allowed paintings and sculptures their independence", Christopher Green wrote, "creating a play of contrasts, hence the involvement non simply of Gleizes and Metzinger themselves, but of Marie Laurencin, the Duchamp brothers (Raymond Duchamp-Villon designed the facade) and Mare'southward erstwhile friends Léger and Roger La Fresnaye".[74]

In 1927, Cubists Joseph Csaky, Jacques Lipchitz, Louis Marcoussis, Henri Laurens, the sculptor Gustave Miklos, and others collaborated in the ornamentation of a Studio House, rue Saint-James, Neuilly-sur-Seine, designed by the architect Paul Ruaud and owned past the French manner designer Jacques Doucet, besides a collector of Postal service-Impressionist and Cubist paintings (including Les Demoiselles d'Avignon, which he bought directly from Picasso's studio). Laurens designed the fountain, Csaky designed Doucet's staircase,[75] Lipchitz made the fireplace mantel, and Marcoussis fabricated a Cubist carpet.[76] [77] [78]

Czech Cubist architecture [edit]

The original Cubist compages is very rare. Cubism was applied to architecture only in Bohemia (today Czech republic) and particularly in its capital, Prague.[79] [eighty] Czech architects were the first and only ones to ever design original Cubist buildings.[81] Cubist architecture flourished for the nigh office between 1910 and 1914, only the Cubist or Cubism-influenced buildings were too congenital after World War I. After the war, the architectural way called Rondo-Cubism was developed in Prague fusing the Cubist compages with round shapes.[82]

In their theoretical rules, the Cubist architects expressed the requirement of dynamism, which would surmount the matter and calm contained in it, through a creative idea, so that the result would evoke feelings of dynamism and expressive plasticity in the viewer. This should be achieved past shapes derived from pyramids, cubes and prisms, past arrangements and compositions of oblique surfaces, mainly triangular, sculpted facades in protruding crystal-like units, reminiscent of the so-chosen diamond cut, or even cavernous that are reminiscent of the tardily Gothic architecture. In this way, the entire surfaces of the facades including fifty-fifty the gables and dormers are sculpted. The grilles besides equally other architectural ornaments attain a three-dimensional grade. Thus, new forms of windows and doors were also created, e. yard. hexagonal windows.[82] Czech Cubist architects also designed Cubist furniture.

The leading Cubist architects were Pavel Janák, Josef Gočár, Vlastislav Hofman, Emil Králíček and Josef Chochol.[82] They worked by and large in Prague but too in other Maverick towns. The best-known Cubist building is the House of the Black Madonna in the Onetime Town of Prague built in 1912 by Josef Gočár with the only Cubist café in the earth, Grand Café Orient.[79] Vlastislav Hofman built the entrance pavilions of Ďáblice Cemetery in 1912–1914, Josef Chochol designed several residential houses under Vyšehrad. A Cubist streetlamp has also been preserved most the Wenceslas Square, designed by Emil Králíček in 1912, who also built the Diamond Firm in the New Town of Prague around 1913.

Cubism in other fields [edit]

The influence of cubism extended to other artistic fields, exterior painting and sculpture. In literature, the written works of Gertrude Stein apply repetition and repetitive phrases equally building blocks in both passages and whole chapters. Most of Stein's important works use this technique, including the novel The Making of Americans (1906–08). Not simply were they the commencement important patrons of Cubism, Gertrude Stein and her brother Leo were as well of import influences on Cubism too. In turn, Picasso was an important influence on Stein's writing. In the field of American fiction, William Faulkner's 1930 novel Every bit I Lay Dying can be read as an interaction with the cubist mode. The novel features narratives of the diverse experiences of 15 characters which, when taken together, produce a single cohesive body.

The poets mostly associated with Cubism are Guillaume Apollinaire, Blaise Cendrars, Jean Cocteau, Max Jacob, André Salmon and Pierre Reverdy. As American poet Kenneth Rexroth explains, Cubism in poetry "is the conscious, deliberate dissociation and recombination of elements into a new creative entity made self-sufficient by its rigorous architecture. This is quite different from the free clan of the Surrealists and the combination of unconscious utterance and political nihilism of Dada."[83] Nevertheless, the Cubist poets' influence on both Cubism and the afterward movements of Dada and Surrealism was profound; Louis Aragon, founding member of Surrealism, said that for Breton, Soupault, Éluard and himself, Reverdy was "our immediate elder, the exemplary poet."[84] Though not besides remembered every bit the Cubist painters, these poets continue to influence and inspire; American poets John Ashbery and Ron Padgett have recently produced new translations of Reverdy's work. Wallace Stevens' "Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blackbird" is likewise said to demonstrate how cubism'due south multiple perspectives can be translated into poetry.[85]

John Berger said: "It is almost incommunicable to exaggerate the importance of Cubism. It was a revolution in the visual arts equally great equally that which took place in the early Renaissance. Its furnishings on later art, on moving-picture show, and on compages are already so numerous that we inappreciably detect them."[86]

Gallery [edit]

  • Pablo Picasso, 1913–14, Femme assise dans un fauteuil (Eva), Woman in an Armchair, oil on sheet, 149.9 x 99.4 cm, Leonard A. Lauder Cubist Drove

  • Pablo Picasso, 1918, Arlequin au violon (Harlequin with Violin), oil on canvas, 142 x 100.iii cm, The Cleveland Museum of Fine art, Ohio

  • Gino Severini, 1919, Bohémien Jouant de 50'Accordéon (The Piano accordion Player), Museo del Novecento, Milan

Press manufactures and reviews [edit]

  • (center) Jean Metzinger, c.1913, Le Fumeur (Man with Pipe), Carnegie Museum of Art, Pittsburgh; (left) Alexander Archipenko, 1914, Danseuse du Médrano (Médrano Ii), (right) Archipenko, 1913, Pierrot-carrousel, Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York. Published in Le Petit Comtois, 13 March 1914

  • Paintings past Fernand Léger, 1912, La Femme en Bleu, Woman in Blue, Kunstmuseum Basel; Jean Metzinger, 1912, Dancer in a café, Albright-Knox Art Gallery; and sculpture by Alexander Archipenko, 1912, La Vie Familiale, Family Life (destroyed). Published in Les Annales politiques et littéraires, n. 1529, 13 October 1912

  • Paintings by Gino Severini, 1911, La Danse du Pan-Pan, and Severini, 1913, L'charabanc. Published in "Les Annales politiques et littéraires", Le Paradoxe Cubiste, xiv March 1920

  • Paintings past Gino Severini, 1911, Souvenirs de Voyage; Albert Gleizes, 1912, Human on a Balcony, L'Homme au balcon; Severini, 1912–xiii, Portrait de Mlle Jeanne Paul-Fort; Luigi Russolo, 1911–12, La Révolte. Published in "Les Annales politiques et littéraires", Le Paradoxe Cubiste (continued), due north. 1916, 14 March 1920

  • Jean Metzinger, c.1911, Nature morte, Compotier et cruche décorée de cerfs; Juan Gris, 1911, Written report for Man in a Café; Marie Laurencin, c.1911, Testa ab plechs; August Agero, sculpture, Bust; Juan Gris, 1912, Guitar and Spectacles, or Banjo and Glasses. Published in Veu de Catalunya, 25 April 1912

  • Umberto Boccioni, 1911, La rue entre dans la maison; Luigi Russolo, 1911, Souvenir d'une nuit. Published in Les Annales politiques et littéraires, 1 December 1912

  • Francis Picabia, paintings published in the New York Tribune, ix March 1913. Picabia held his showtime one-human show in New York, Exhibition of New York studies by Francis Picabia, at 291 art gallery (formerly Piddling Galleries of the Photo-Secession), March 17 - April five, 1913

Encounter also [edit]

  • Fourth dimension in art
  • Precisionism
  • Proto-Cubism
  • Rayonism
  • Department d'Or

References [edit]

  1. ^ Jean Metzinger, Note sur la peinture, Pan (Paris), Oct–November 1910
  2. ^ a b Christopher Green, MoMA drove, Cubism, Introduction, from Grove Art Online, Oxford University Press, 2009 Archived 2014-08-xiii at the Wayback Machine
  3. ^ Cubism: The Leonard A. Lauder Collection, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, 2014 Archived 2015-05-17 at the Wayback Motorcar
  4. ^ Christopher Green, MoMA drove Cubism, Origins and awarding of the term, from Grove Art Online, Oxford University Press, 2009 Archived 2014-06-xiii at the Wayback Motorcar
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l grand n o p q r Christopher Green, 2009, Cubism, MoMA, Grove Art Online, Oxford University Press Archived 2014-08-13 at the Wayback Automobile
  6. ^ Joann Moser, Jean Metzinger in Retrospect, Pre-Cubist works, 1904–1909, The University of Iowa Museum of Fine art, J. Paul Getty Trust, University of Washington Press 1985, pp. 34–42
  7. ^ Hajo Düchting, Orphism, MoMA, Grove Art Online, Oxford University Press, 2009
  8. ^ Magdalena Dabrowski, Geometric Abstraction, Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, 2000
  9. ^ a b Christopher Dark-green, 2009, Cubism, Meanings and interpretations, MoMA, Grove Art Online, Oxford University Press, 2009 Archived 2015-07-02 at the Wayback Car
  10. ^ Christina Lodder, 2009, Constructivism, Formation, 1914–21, MoMA, Grove Fine art Online, Oxford Academy Printing, 2009 Archived 2008-x-24 at the Wayback Automobile
  11. ^ Laurels, H. and J. Fleming, (2009) A World History of Art. seventh edn. London: Laurence Male monarch Publishing, p. 784. ISBN 9781856695848
  12. ^ a b Douglas Cooper, "The Cubist Epoch", pp. eleven–221, 232, Phaidon Press Limited 1970 in association with the Los Angeles County Museum of Art and the Metropolitan Museum of Art ISBN 0-87587-041-4
  13. ^ a b c Cooper, 24
  14. ^ Louis Vauxcelles, Exposition Braques, Gil Blas, xiv November 1908, Gallica (BnF)
  15. ^ a b Danchev, Alex (March 29, 2007). Georges Braque: A Life. Penguin Books Express. ISBN9780141905006 – via Google Books.
  16. ^ Futurism in Paris – The Advanced Explosion, Eye Pompidou, Paris 2008
  17. ^ Louis Vauxcelles, Le Salon des Indépendants, Gil Blas, 25 March 1909, Gallica (BnF)
  18. ^ D.-H. Kahnweiler. Der Weg zum Kubismus (Munich, 1920; Eng. trans., New York, 1949)
  19. ^ C. Greenberg. The Pasted-paper Revolution, ARTnews, 57 (1958), pp. 46–nine, sixty–61; repr. as 'Collage' in Art and Civilisation (Boston, 1961), pp. lxx–83
  20. ^ Berger, John (1969). The Moment of Cubism . New York, NY: Pantheon. ISBN9780297177098.
  21. ^ a b "Fondation Gleizes, Chronologie (in French)" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on November 12, 2008.
  22. ^ "Gil Blas / dir. A. Dumont". Gallica. March 18, 1910.
  23. ^ Daniel Robbins, Jean Metzinger: At the Center of Cubism, 1985, Jean Metzinger in Retrospect, The Academy of Iowa Museum of Fine art, J. Paul Getty Trust, Academy of Washington Printing
  24. ^ a b c Guillaume Apollinaire, Les Peintres cubistes: Méditations esthétiques (Paris, 1913)
  25. ^ "Eiffel Tower". The Guggenheim Museums and Foundation. Archived from the original on February 28, 2014.
  26. ^ "The Wild Men of Paris". www.architecturalrecord.com. Archived from the original on April 24, 2016.
  27. ^ a b "Eccentric School of Painting Increases Its Vogue in the Current Art Exhibition --- What Its Followers Attempt to Do". October 8, 1911. Archived from the original on March 5, 2016 – via NYTimes.com.
  28. ^ a b "The "Cubists" Dominate Paris' Fall Salon, The New York Times, Oct eight, 1911 (High-resolution PDF)" (PDF).
  29. ^ Philadelphia Museum of Art, Marcel Duchamp, Nude Descending a Staircase, No. two Archived 2017-09-eighteen at the Wayback Motorcar
  30. ^ "Statens Museum for Kunst, National Gallery of Denmark, Jean Metzinger, 1911–12, Woman with a Equus caballus, oil on canvas, 162 × 130 cm". Archived from the original on January 15, 2012.
  31. ^ a b Marker Antliff and Patricia Leighten, A Cubism Reader, Documents and Criticism, 1906–1914, Academy of Chicago Press, 2008, pp. 293–295
  32. ^ Ballad A. Hess, Manuel de Falla and Modernism in Kingdom of spain, 1898–1936, University of Chicago Printing, 2001, p. 76, ISBN 0226330389
  33. ^ Commemoració del centenari del cubisme a Barcelona. 1912–2012, Associació Catalana de Crítics d'Art – ACCA
  34. ^ Mercè Vidal, L'exposició d'Art Cubista de les Galeries Dalmau 1912, Edicions Universitat Barcelona, 1996, ISBN 8447513831
  35. ^ David Cottington, Cubism in the Shadow of War: The Avant-garde and Politics in Paris 1905–1914, Yale University Printing, 1998, ISBN 0300075294
  36. ^ "Exposició d'Fine art Cubista". Dalmau Galleries.
  37. ^ Joaquim Folch i Torres, Els Cubistes a cân Dalmau, Pàgina artística de La Veu de Catalunya Archived 2018-04-22 at the Wayback Automobile (Barcelona) 18 April 1912, Any 22, núm. 4637–4652 (16–thirty abr. 1912)
  38. ^ Joaquim Folch y Torres, "El cubisme", Pàgina Artística de La Veu, La Veu de Catalunya, 25 April 1912 (includes numerous manufactures on the artists and exhibition)
  39. ^ a b William H. Robinson, Jordi Falgàs, Carmen Belen Lord, Barcelona and Modernity: Picasso, Gaudí, Miró, Dalí, Cleveland Museum of Fine art, Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York), Yale University Printing, 2006, ISBN 0300121067
  40. ^ Cubist caricature, Esquella de La Torratxa, Núm 1740 (3 maig 1912)
  41. ^ a b "[Exposició d'Art Cubista - Noticiero Universal]". Dalmau Galleries.
  42. ^ Jaime Brihuega, Las Vanguardias Artísticas en España 1909–1936, Madrid. Istmo.1981
  43. ^ "Le Journal". Gallica. October v, 1912. Archived from the original on September 4, 2015.
  44. ^ a b Journal officiel de la République française. Débats parlementaires. Chambre des députés, iii Décembre 1912, pp. 2924–2929. Bibliothèque et Athenaeum de l'Assemblée nationale, 2012–7516 Archived 2015-09-04 at the Wayback Machine. ISSN 1270-5942
  45. ^ Patrick F. Barrer: Quand l'art du XXe siècle était conçu par les inconnus, pp. 93–101, gives an business relationship of the debate.
  46. ^ "biography". world wide web.peterbrooke.org.united kingdom. Archived from the original on May 22, 2013.
  47. ^ "Albert-Gleizes-œuvre". September 18, 2007. Archived from the original on 2007-09-eighteen.
  48. ^ a b "The History and Chronology of Cubism, p. 5". Archived from the original on March 14, 2013.
  49. ^ "La Section d'Or, Numéro spécial, 9 Octobre 1912". Archived from the original on Apr iii, 2017.
  50. ^ Cooper, 20–27
  51. ^ a b c d e f g Robbins, Daniel (April 19, 1964). "Albert Gleizes, 1881-1953 : a retrospective exhibition". [New York : Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation] – via Internet Archive.
  52. ^ Louis Chassevent, Les Artistes Indépendants, 1906, Quelques Petits Salons. Paris, 1908. Chassevent discussed Delaunay and Metzinger in terms of Signac'due south influence, referring to Metzinger's "precision in the cut of his cubes..."
  53. ^ a b Robert Herbert, Neo-Impressionism, The Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation, New York, 1968
  54. ^ A. Gleizes and J. Metzinger. Du "Cubisme", Edition Figuière, Paris, 1912 (Eng. trans., London, 1913)
  55. ^ "Mercure de France : série moderne / directeur Alfred Vallette". Gallica. December 1, 1912. Archived from the original on September 4, 2015.
  56. ^ a b Cottington, David (April 19, 2004). Cubism and Its Histories. Manchester University Press. ISBN9780719050046. Archived from the original on January ane, 2016 – via Google Books.
  57. ^ Christopher Greenish, Cubism and Its Enemies: Modern Movements and Reaction in French Art, 1916–1928 Archived 2016-01-01 at the Wayback Machine, Yale Academy Press, New Haven and London, 1987, ISBN 0300034687
  58. ^ "The Museum of Modern Art". Moma.org. Retrieved 2011-06-11 .
  59. ^ Kolokytha, Chara; Hammond, J.Thou.; Vlčková, Lucie. "Cubism". Routledge Encyclopedia of Modernism.
  60. ^ Archive, Asia Art. "Cubism in Asia: Unbounded Dialogues – Written report". aaa.org.hk . Retrieved 2018-12-22 .
  61. ^ Gris, Juan. "Portrait of Pablo Picasso". The Art Institute of Chicago . Retrieved 2021-06-07 .
  62. ^ Pablo Picasso, 1909–10, Head of a Woman, statuary, published in Umělecký Mĕsíčník, 1913 Archived 2014-03-03 at the Wayback Auto, Blue Mountain Project, Princeton Academy
  63. ^ Robert Rosenblum, "Cubism," Readings in Fine art History 2 (1976), Seuphor, Sculpture of this Century
  64. ^ Balas, Edith (April 19, 1998). Joseph Csáky: A Pioneer of Mod Sculpture. American Philosophical Society. ISBN9780871692306. Archived from the original on January i, 2016 – via Google Books.
  65. ^ a b Compages and cubism. Centre canadien d'architecture/Canadian Centre for Architecture : MIT Printing. Apr 19, 2002. OCLC 915987228 – via Open up WorldCat.
  66. ^ a b c "The Drove | MoMA". The Museum of Mod Art. Archived from the original on April five, 2012.
  67. ^ P. R. Banham. Theory and Design in the Offset Machine Age (London, 1960), p. 203
  68. ^ Choay, Françoise, le corbusier (1960), pp. x–11. George Braziller, Inc. ISBN 0-8076-0104-7
  69. ^ "Albert Gleizes and Jean Metzinge, except from Du Cubisme, 1912" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on June 2, 2013.
  70. ^ La Maison Cubiste, 1912 Archived 2013-03-13 at the Wayback Machine
  71. ^ Kubistische werken op de Armory Bear witness Archived 2013-03-13 at the Wayback Automobile
  72. ^ "Particular of Duchamp-Villon's Façade architecturale, 1913, from the Walt Kuhn Family papers and Armory Testify records, 1859-1984, majority 1900-1949". www.aaa.si.edu. Archived from the original on March 14, 2013.
  73. ^ "Catalogue of international exhibition of modern art: at the Arsenal of the Sixty-ninth Infantry". Clan of American Painters and Sculptors. April nineteen, 1913 – via Cyberspace Annal.
  74. ^ Greenish, Christopher (January one, 2000). Art in France, 1900-1940. Yale Academy Press. ISBN0300099088. Archived from the original on November 30, 2016 – via Google Books.
  75. ^ Light-green, Christopher (2000). Joseph Csaky'southward staircase in the dwelling of Jacques Doucet. ISBN0300099088. Archived from the original on 30 April 2016. Retrieved 18 December 2012.
  76. ^ Rex, Aestheticus (14 Apr 2011). "Jacques Doucet's Studio St. James at Neuilly-sur-Seine". Aestheticusrex.blogspot.com.es. Archived from the original on 27 March 2013. Retrieved 18 December 2012.
  77. ^ Imbert, Dorothée (1993). The Modernist Garden in France, Dorothée Imbert, 1993, Yale University Printing. ISBN0300047169. Archived from the original on 30 Apr 2016. Retrieved 18 Dec 2012.
  78. ^ Balas, Edith (1998). Joseph Csáky: A Pioneer of Modern Sculpture, Edith Balas, 1998, p. 5. ISBN9780871692306. Archived from the original on thirty April 2016. Retrieved eighteen December 2012.
  79. ^ a b Boněk, Jan (2014). Cubist Prague. Prague: Eminent. p. ix. ISBN978-80-7281-469-five.
  80. ^ "Cubism". www.czechtourism.com. CzechTourism. Archived from the original on 16 October 2015. Retrieved 1 September 2015.
  81. ^ "Cubist architecture". world wide web.radio.cz. Radio Prague. Archived from the original on xi September 2015. Retrieved 1 September 2015.
  82. ^ a b c "Czech Cubism". www.kubista.cz. Kubista. Archived from the original on 8 October 2015. Retrieved one September 2015.
  83. ^ Rexroth, Kenneth. "The Cubist Verse of Pierre Reverdy (Rexroth)". Bopsecrets.org. Archived from the original on 2011-05-xix. Retrieved 2011-06-11 .
  84. ^ Reverdy, Pierre. "Championship Page > Pierre Reverdy: Selected Poems". Bloodaxe Books. Archived from the original on 2011-05-27. Retrieved 2011-06-11 .
  85. ^ "Untitled Document". Archived from the original on 2007-08-13. Retrieved 2008-04-07 .
  86. ^ Berger, John. (1965). The Success and Failure of Picasso. Penguin Books, Ltd. p. 73. ISBN 978-0-679-73725-4.

Farther reading [edit]

  • Alfred H. Barr, Jr., Cubism and Abstruse Art, New York: Museum of Modern Art, 1936.
  • Cauman, John (2001). Inheriting Cubism: The Impact of Cubism on American Art, 1909–1936. New York: Hollis Taggart Galleries. ISBN0-9705723-4-four.
  • Cooper, Douglas (1970). The Cubist Epoch. London: Phaidon in association with the Los Angeles County Museum of Art & the Metropolitan Museum of Art. ISBN0-87587-041-4.
  • Paolo Vincenzo Genovese, Cubismo in architettura, Mancosu Editore, Roma, 2010. In Italian.
  • John Golding, Cubism: A History and an Analysis, 1907-1914, New York: Wittenborn, 1959.
  • Richardson, John. A Life Of Picasso, The Cubist Insubordinate 1907–1916. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1991. ISBN 978-0-307-26665-one
  • Mark Antliff and Patricia Leighten, A Cubism Reader, Documents and Criticism, 1906–1914, The University of Chicago Printing, 2008
  • Christopher Dark-green, Cubism and its Enemies, Modern Movements and Reaction in French Fine art, 1916–28, Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1987
  • Mikhail Lifshitz, The Crisis of Ugliness: From Cubism to Popular-Art. Translated and with an Introduction by David Riff. Leiden: BRILL, 2018 (originally published in Russian by Iskusstvo, 1968)
  • Daniel Robbins, Sources of Cubism and Futurism, Art Journal, Vol. 41, No. 4, (Winter 1981)
  • Cécile Debray, Françoise Lucbert, La Department d'or, 1912-1920-1925, Musées de Châteauroux, Musée Fabre, exhibition catalogue, Éditions Cercle d'art, Paris, 2000
  • Ian Johnston, Preliminary Notes on Cubist Architecture in Prague, 2004

External links [edit]

  • Cubism, Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History, Metropolitan Museum of Art
  • Cubism, Agence Photographique de la Réunion des musées nationaux et du Grand Palais des Champs-Elysées (RMN)
  • Czech Cubist Architecture
  • Cubism, Guggenheim Collection Online
  • Index of Historic Collectors and Dealers of Cubism, Leonard A. Lauder Inquiry Centre for Modern Art, Metropolitan Museum of Art
  • Elizabeth Carlson, Cubist Fashion: Mainstreaming Modernism afterwards the Arsenal, Winterthur Portfolio, Vol. 48, No. ane (Bound 2014), pp. 1–28. doi:10.1086/675687

fieldscompost.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubism

0 Response to "Bold European Artworks Displayed at the Armory Show Helped Change the Style of Art in America"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel